Legal Opinion

Keer, Maurer Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 31, 1954No. 57959; protests 186297-K and 190152-K (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of these protests is described on the invoices as “sheepskin flicks” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1506 of-the Tariff Act of 1930 for “all other brushes, not specially provided for.” Although various claims are made in the protests, the claim relied upon is that for duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1120 of the said act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for “Manufactures, wholly or in chief value…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SheldonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaysons Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Fred Roberts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Freni v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Nestle-Lemur Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Needler's British Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API