Dorgeloh v. Murtha
New York Supreme Court
Action to have a marriage adjudicated as- null and void.
1Opinion of the CourtAspinall, J.
This is an action to have a marriage adjudicated as null and void, ab initio, upon the ground that the plaintiff had not attained the age of eighteen years at the time of the marriage; that the consent of the father, mother, guardian or other person having legal charge of the plaintiff had not been obtained; that the marriage was not consummated by cohabitation, and that there was no ratification by any mutual assent of the parties after the plaintiff had attained the age of eighteen years, and also upon the ground that the consent of the plaintiff was obtained by force, duress and fraud.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Ferlat v. GojonNew York Court of Chancery · 1825
- Aymar v. RoffNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Mpiliris v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Crouch v. WartenbergWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Mo-Se-Che-He's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Amsden v. AmsdenNew York Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.