Legal Opinion
Amsden v. Amsden
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fred D. Cribb,
Official Eeferee. This action having been reached for trial at an equity term of the Supreme Court the defendant withdrew her answer, in which she had counterclaimed for divorce, and the presiding Justice referred the case to me as Official Eeferee to hear, try and determine. At the trial defendant was represented by counsel who stated that she was not opposing the relief sought by plaintiff but was interested only in any provision the court might make for the support of the child.
The plaintiff has instituted this action against the defendant seeking an annulment of their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- di Lorenzo v. di LorenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Griffin v. GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Dorgeloh v. MurthaNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Griffin v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The United States of America v. Jose Diogo, Domingo Das Canas Costa and Manuel Vilanova GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Ebker v. Tan Jay International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Sheils v. SheilsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Devorah H. v. Steven S.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- Sheils v. SheilsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.