Legal Opinion

Aymar v. Roff

New York Court of Chancery

Decided October 10, 1817PublishedCited by 6 opinions

THE bill stated that the plaintiff, Eliza A. the infant, was the daughter of Peter A. and under 13 years of age. That in August last, the infant, with her mother, went from the city of New-York to Staten Island, and boarded with Mrs, Roff. That the infant there became acquainted with the defendant son of Mrs. Roff, who was about 33 or 34 years of age. That on the 37th of September last, the defendant proposed to the infant to go to a minister and be married.

Read the full summary

THE bill stated that the plaintiff, Eliza A. the infant, was the daughter of Peter A. and under 13 years of age. That in August last, the infant, with her mother, went from the city of New-York to Staten Island, and boarded with Mrs, Roff. That the infant there became acquainted with the defendant son of Mrs. Roff, who was about 33 or 34 years of age. That on the 37th of September last, the defendant proposed to the infant to go to a minister and be married. That the infant then being under 13 years of age, and ignorant of the duties which the marriage, if legal, would impose, and considering…

1Opinion of the Court

The following order was made by the court

“Oh reading the bill, and on motion of Mr. D. S. Jones, of counsel for the plaintiffs, and the said infant being examined in court, and repeating the same declaration r Ordered, that the said Eliza Arm Aymar be pla' ced under the protection of this court, as. a ward thereof, and that the defendant refrain from holding any conversa*51tion¿ or from having any intercourse- or correspondence with the said Eliza, so long as this order remains in force, under the pain of incurring a contempt.”

N. B. No further order was asked for in this case, so that nothing…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Carris v. CarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
  3. Dorgeloh v. MurthaNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re FedermanNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API