Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Romanelli

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 16, 1993No. 1-91-2779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE MANNING

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff-appellant, Prudential Insurance Company (Prudential), appeals from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for a directed verdict entered after presentation of Prudential’s case in chief. Prudential, as the subrogee of its insured, Agnes Nierman (Nierman), sought contribution from nonsettling defendants Edward Romanelli (Romanelli) and Abel Solorio (Solorio) in an underlying automobile accident negligence case.

On appeal Prudential contends that the trial court erred by requiring it to pursue the action in its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Korpalski v. LymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Hemken v. FIRST NAT'L BK. OF LITCHFIELDAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Shaw v. CloseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Bailey v. City of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norberg v. Centex Homes Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Orejel v. York Intern. Corp., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Gadson v. Among Friends Adult Day Care, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. Cherny v. FuentesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Developers Surety & Indemnity Co. v. LipinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API