Legal Opinion
Hemken v. FIRST NAT'L BK. OF LITCHFIELD
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 7, 1979No. 15405PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
A repossessed truck tractor.
No notice of intended sale.
Valid sale? No.
We reverse and remand.
Willard and Marilyn Hemken brought suit to recover damages for the failure of the First National Bank of Litchfield and Werner Motor Company to provide them with a notice of the intended sale of a repossessed 1971 CMC Astro tractor. The trial court granted the bank’s motion to dismiss as to it and the case proceeded to a bench trial where a directed verdict was entered in favor of defendant, Werner Motor Company. Only the propriety of the entry of that directed verdict is questioned in this matter, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- City of Evanston v. Ridgeview House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Tauber v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Morris Plan Co. of Bettendorf v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
3Cited by22 opinions
- C&f Packing Co., Inc. v. Ibp, Inc., and Pizza Hut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Mohr v. Dix Mutual County Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Drs. Sellke & Conlon, Ltd. v. Twin Oaks Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Roeseke v. PryorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Sawyers v. FMA Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.