Legal Opinion
Plasencia v. State of California
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 18, 1998No. CV 98-0576 DDP (RNBX)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants Daniel Marquez (“Marquez”), Joe Quiroz (“Quiroz”), and Kathleen Thompson (“Thompson”) (collectively “Defendants”). Oral argument was heard on August 10,1998.
In its previous order, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff Edison Plasencia’s (“Plasencia”) claims against the State of California (the “State”), the Department of the California Youth Authority (“CYA”), and El…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- MacArthur Rumbles v. Donald R. Hill Black and BeckettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sagan v. Sumner County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Shaheed-Muhammad v. DipaoloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Covington v. Knox County School SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Covington v. Knox County School SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.