Legal Opinion
Shaheed-Muhammad v. Dipaolo
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 19, 2001No. CIV.A. 99-11842NGPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERTNER, District Judge.
Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad (“Muhammad”) brings this action pro se against the defendants, employees of the Massachusetts Department of Corrections (“DOC”). Muhammad alleges a deprivation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under related Massachusetts constitutional and statutory provisions in connection with his incarceration at the Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center (“SBCC”) maximum security prison in Shirley, Massachusetts.
Muhammad’s claims center around what he describes as a violation of his right to practice his Muslim religion. He…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Searles v. Van BebberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Lipton v. County of Orange, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Royal v. KautzkyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Partelow v. MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Shaheed-Muhammad v. DipaoloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.