Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. 5043 Anderson Road
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
The facts in this appeal are undisputed and present an issue of first impression relating to in rem forfeiture proceedings. Cyrus Kinney owned and lived in a residence on an approximately twenty-four-acre parcel of land, described in a single recorded deed, which he had inherited from his mother. For several years, he had conducted a lucrative business selling marijuana from the residence and a detached garage adjacent to the house. Following an undercover investigation, police obtained a search warrant and searched Kinney’s house. In the house,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re King PropertiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. Wingait FarmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Real Property & Improvements Commonly Known as 5444 Spruce StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- West Conshohocken Restaurant Associates, Inc. v. FlaniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Real Property & ImprovementsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. One HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.