Johnson v. Madrid Motor Corp.
Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Winnet,
These proceedings are irregular. On August 11, 1943, this court made absolute plaintiff’s rule to amend the record by adding an additional defendant. An exception was requested and allowed. The cause was then set down for argument on the exception. This argument was but a repetition of the former one. Such a practice must be discouraged. The rules of court do not provide for argument on exceptions to an interlocutory order of the court. *259We will, however, consider the second argument in the nature of a reargument on the prior order of this court.
Plaintiff has brought action in trespass…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- White Co. v. Fayette Automobile Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Mangan v. Schuylkill CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Barrilo v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Leland v. Firemen's InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.