Mangan v. Schuylkill County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 11, Jan. T., 1922, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1918, No. 359, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of M. A. Mangan and W. S. Pugh et al., trading as Mangan & Pugh, v. Schuylkill County. Assumpsit on contract. Before Bechtel, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Nonsuit which the court refused to take off. Plaintiffs appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was refusal to take off non-suit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
April 30, 1918, “M. A. Mangan and William S. Pugh, trading under the firm name of Mangan & Pugh,” brought suit against the County of Schuylkill, to recover $3,400, with interest from November 1, 1917, on a written contract for the erection of a county bridge, completed and opened to the public about October 1, 1917, since which time it has been in regular use. At the close of the testimony, counsel for defendant moved for a compulsory non-suit on several grounds, two of which are now before us; namely, (1) that there were not proper parties plaintiff,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church of Franklin v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Walker v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Patton v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
- Paxos v. Jarka CorporationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Lamb v. CondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Aiken, to Use v. MayberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.