Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
As part of its oversight of drugs subject to the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) regularly issues investigative subpoenas. Those subpoenas are issued without prior approval by a court. In response to two recent subpoenas, Oregon’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (“Oregon,” the “Oregon Program,” or “PDMP”) sought a declaratory judgment that, under state law, the DEA must obtain a court order to enforce the subpoenas. The Oregon Program did not claim, however, that the DEA must obtain a warrant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Dan Clark v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lewis v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.