Legal Opinion

Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2017No. 14-35402PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

As part of its oversight of drugs subject to the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) regularly issues investigative subpoenas. Those subpoenas are issued without prior approval by a court. In response to two recent subpoenas, Oregon’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (“Oregon,” the “Oregon Program,” or “PDMP”) sought a declaratory judgment that, under state law, the DEA must obtain a court order to enforce the subpoenas. The Oregon Program did not claim, however, that the DEA must obtain a warrant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Dan Clark v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Lewis v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API