Gandy v. Borras
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
— Sections 3577-3583, C. G. L., 2244-2250, R. G. S., provide that a board of examiners and license commissioners composed of three members shall be appointed by the mayor in each city of this State having 6,000 inhabitants or more, for the purpose of examining and licensing persons who in said cities may engage or work at the business of operating or assisting in the. operation of any cinematograph or similar apparatus known as a moving picture machine. Under Section 7718, C. G. L., 5541, R. G. S., any person violating the licensing statutes above mentioned, either as an operator or manager,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. HaireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Pridgen v. SweatSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Eelbeck Milling Company v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.