Legal Opinion
Eelbeck Milling Company v. Mayo
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 28, 1956PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
86 So.2d 438 (1956)
EELBECK MILLING COMPANY of Florida, a corporation, Appellant,
v.
Nathan T. MAYO, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.
March 28, 1956.
Edward McCarthy and McCarthy, Lane & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and John D. Moriarty, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
O'CONNELL, Justice.
The appellant, Eelbeck Milling Company, sought a decree declaring its rights under Chapter 28269, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1953, determining the validity of the Act, and restraining the enforcement of its terms in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wheeler v. MeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Van Pelt v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Miami Laundry Co. v. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Varholy v. SweatSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burnsed v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Newman v. CarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Palm Beach Mobile Homes, Inc. v. StrongSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Florida Citrus Commission v. Golden GiftSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Corneal v. State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.