Legal Opinion

Smith v. Seibly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1967No. 38891PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shorett, J. †

This litigation results from a vasectomy operation performed upon the person of Albert G. Smith, the appellant, by the respondent, Walter W. Seibly, a practicing physician at Clarkston. At the time of the operation the appellant was 18 years old, married and the father of a child. He was gainfully employed, supported his family and maintained a home for himself, his wife and child. He was afflicted with a progressive muscular disease, myasthenia gravis, which is chronic and incurable and would possibly affect his future earning capacity and ability to support his family. Under…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Grannum v. BerardWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In re HollopeterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Blood v. Allied Stores Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. KoomeWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Baird v. BellottiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
  4. Northern State Construction Co. v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sturgeon v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API