Legal Opinion
Alliance Research Corp. v. Telular Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 25, 1994No. CV 94-1065 RGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
GADBOIS, District Judge.
I. Background
Telular Corporation (“Telular”) owns U.S. Patent No. 4,658,096 (“’096 Patent”), which describes an interface device that connects ordinary telephone equipment with wireless cellular networks. Telular also owns U.S. Patents 4,775,997 (‘997 Patent) and 4,922,517 (‘517 Patent), which describe interfaces which connect standard telephone equipment with a conventional cellular mobile radio transceivers. Both the ’997 patent and the ’517 patent are continuations of the ’096 patent.
By allowing persons to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Smith International, Inc., a California Corporation v. Hughes Tool Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nutrition 21 v. The United States of America v. Thorne Research, Inc., Albert F. CzapCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc. v. AirSep Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. Avery Dennison Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Abbott Laboratories v. Selfcare, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998