Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Frank Mathews,. Assigned Judge. Action by Birdie Tate against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was commenced by Birdie Tate, as surviving widow, against the railroad company for damages resulting to herself and her infant child on account of the death of her husband, J. M. Tate. There was a trial to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, to wit, the sum of $2,995. A brief summary of the allegations of the petition is: That the deceased was a resident of the town of Seminole, Seminole county, Okla., and the proprietor of a restaurant; that the defendant company operated its line of railroad through…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Smith v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. O'NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Okmulgee Gas Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Kaw Boiler Works v. FrymyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.