Williams v. B. A. Feiniman & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Anderson District Court. This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace to recover the price of goods sold and delivered by B. A. Feiniman & Co. to Williams # Pattee.
Read the full summary
Error from Anderson District Court. This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace to recover the price of goods sold and delivered by B. A. Feiniman & Co. to Williams # Pattee. Plaintiffs’ bill of particulars shows the “goods” sold were several half-barrels of whisky, and several kegs and cases of brandy, ginr and wine, amounting to $293.97, on which defendants were credited with payments to amount- of $9.5. The plaintiffs-were wholesale liquor-dealers, residing and doing business at Kansas City, Mo. The defendants were doing business at Garnett, in this state. Answer, a…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This case is in all essential particulars similar to that of Haug v. Gillett, recently decided by this court, (ante, 140,) except that in this case the vendor resided and had his place of business outside the state. Feiniman & Co. are wholesale liquor-dealers in Kansas City, Mo., in which place they have paid all taxes required by the state or national authorities for carrying on that business. Their store and stock of goods was in that place, and they had neither store nor stock in this state. The goods for which this action was brought…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kline v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Finch v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DelamaterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Bixley v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Glass v. AltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877