Glass v. Alt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Wyandotte District Court. Action by Glass, on a promissory note for $89. Trial at the September Term 1874. Verdict and judgment for defendant. The opinion contains a full statement of the facts. Plaintiff Glass brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action on a promissory note. The defendant Alt set up as a defense that the note was given by him to the plaintiff Glass in consideration for intoxicating liquor sold by the plaintiff to the defendant in violation of the dramshop act. The evidence upon this subject, so far as it is necessary to state it, is as follows: The note is dated, “Kansas City, Mo., March 13th 1874,” and is made payable in thirty days “at Kansas City Savings Bank.” The plaintiff testified “that the note in suit was taken by him in full payment for a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gill v. S. Kaufman & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Haug v. GillettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Dolson v. HopeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- McCarty v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Williams v. B. A. Feiniman & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898