State v. Delamater
South Dakota Supreme Court
'.Error to Circuit Court, Potter County. Pión. LoRinG E. GaRRy, Judge. Jay Delamater was convicted of a violation of the liquor laws, and brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.
The evidence upon which the defendant was convicted is conceded to have established the following facts: “That the defendant, Jay Delamater, is now, and was on the ioth day of February, A. D. 1904, a traveling salesman employed by Lewis L. Metzger & Co., and that the said Lewis L. Metzger & Co. are residents of the city of St. Paul, in the state of Minnesota, and that the said Lewis L. Metzger & Co. have their place of business at the said city of St. Paul, and have no place of business in the state of South Dakota, and have had no such place of business in the said state of South Dakota.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- R. M. Rose Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Conrad Seipp Brewing Co. v. GreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909