Legal Opinion

Smith v. Busniewski

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1952No. Civ. 15171PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant Busniewski from a decree in equity setting aside and vacating a judgment by default, secured by him against the plaintiff Smith in an earlier action in the superior court of San Mateo County.

The plaintiff herein first sought relief in the original action under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. However, the statutory time had expired and relief was denied. He then instituted the instant action and was granted the relief sought. The trial court found: (1) “that the default of plaintiff’’ (the defendant in the main action) “was made…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. McCreadie v. ArquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Evry v. TrembleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Mechling v. Asbestos, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API