The League of Women Voters of Florida, etc. v. Ken Detzner Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.
In this appeal involving legal issues of first impression, we review a trial court’s finding that the 2012 “redistricting process” and the “resulting map” apportioning Florida’s twenty-seven congressional districts were “taint[ed]” by unconstitutional intent to favor the Republican Party and incumbent lawmakers.1 Cognizant that this Court’s role is not to select a redistricting map that performs better for one political party or another, but is instead to uphold the purposes of the constitutional provision approved by Florida voters to outlaw partisan intent in redistricting, the crux of what…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shelby County v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- League of Women Voters of Florida v. DetznerSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Lee Memorial Health System v. Progressive Select InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Todeschi v. Sumitomo Metal Mining Pogo, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.