Reid v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Generally speaking, when a judgment is affirmed the case is ended; but when a new trial is granted, the judgment of the appellate court, granting a new trial, in effect reaches back to the point where the first error complained of was made. A new trial in this case meant a re-examination of the issues of fact in the same court where it was formerly tried. Black’s Law Dictionary, 1755; 9 Michie’s Dig. Ga. R., 578; 2 Pope’s Legal Definitions, 1065. There was no demurrer in this case on the former trial. When a motion for new trial was granted by this court (Sinclair Refining Co. v. Reid, 60 Ga.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- King v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Lanier v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Dowman-Dozier Manufacturing Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Riggs v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Holcombe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Brady v. GlossonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.