Legal Opinion

Reid v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1940No. 27977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

Generally speaking, when a judgment is affirmed the case is ended; but when a new trial is granted, the judgment of the appellate court, granting a new trial, in effect reaches back to the point where the first error complained of was made. A new trial in this case meant a re-examination of the issues of fact in the same court where it was formerly tried. Black’s Law Dictionary, 1755; 9 Michie’s Dig. Ga. R., 578; 2 Pope’s Legal Definitions, 1065. There was no demurrer in this case on the former trial. When a motion for new trial was granted by this court (Sinclair Refining Co. v. Reid, 60 Ga.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. King v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Lanier v. BuggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Dowman-Dozier Manufacturing Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Riggs v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Holcombe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Brady v. GlossonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API