Legal Opinion

Cameron's Run, LLP v. Frohock

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 21, 2010No. 08-505PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendants appeal from the superior court’s decision establishing the location of the disputed rear boundary of their property in Milton, Vermont. We reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The following facts are not in dispute. Russell and Shirley Sweeney deeded the parcel of land at issue to defendant Frohock’s parents in 1964. The deed of conveyance describes the lot as “located on the easterly side of [R]ailroad Street Extension . . . [with] frontage on said Railroad Street [Extension of 131 feet; a southerly line of 131 feet; [an] easterly line of 125 feet [;] and a northerly line of 136 feet.”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Pion v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Rowe v. LavanwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re SpearSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Tibbetts v. MICHAELIDESSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Doran v. West HavenVermont Superior Court · 2024
  4. Equinox on the Battenkill Management Assn., Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. Equinox on the Battenkill Management Assn., Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API