Sherwood v. Kyle
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Lake County granting a new trial. R. W. Crump, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action for slander, wherein the p1aintiffs seek damages for injurious words spoken of the plaintiff, Julia C., in respect to her profession or occupation as a school teacher.
After suitable allegations in regard to the qualification and occupation of said Julia C., plaintiffs charge that while engaged in her profession, and while school was in session, defendant entered her schoolroom, and, in the hearing of the pupils, spoke willfully and maliciously to, of and concerning said plaintiff the following false and scandalous words: “You have no business to be in charge of young…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lee v. S. Pac. R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Gregg v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by14 opinions
- Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- James v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.