Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Cassese

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1965No. Calendar No. 37, Docket No. 50,210PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

On June 7, 1950, form letters advising that condemnation was about to be started were sent by the city of Detroit to defendant, the owner of two properties, and to all other persons having, an interest in properties in an area slated for urban renewal. Suit followed and Us pendens were filed. Ten years later the city abandoned the project and discontinued suit.

This condemnation action was begun February 1, 1962, pursuant to PA 1945, No 344 (CL 1948 and CLS 1961, § 125.71 et seq., as amended [Stat Ann 1948 Rev and Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 5.3501 et. seq.]). On trial, appellant contended the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Thomas E. Foster and Georgia Lee Foster, and Cross-Appellants v. City of Detroit, Michigan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  4. In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API