Legal Opinion
Rocque v. Design Land Developers of Milford, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 2004No. AC 23701PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Design Land Developers of Milford, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for contempt filed by the plaintiff, Arthur J. Rocque, Jr., the commissioner of environmental protection, for the defendant’s alleged violation of a stipulated judgment. The dispositive *363issues in this appeal are whether (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the commissioner’s motion for contempt because the defendant was in compliance with the terms of the stipulated judgment prior to, and at the time of, the contempt hearing and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Edmond v. FoiseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Gravius v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Gil v. GilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Dionne v. DionneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.