Legal Opinion

Novoseller v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1983No. 3190PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:.

Appellant challenges the stacking or cumulation of insurance policy coverages assessed against it by an arbitration panel. We find that the lower court correctly upheld the panel’s determination and, accordingly, affirm.

On November 1, 1967, Harold Novoseller, 1 while operating one of his employer’s nine taxi cabs, collided with an uninsured vehicle. Both Novoseller’s employer’s insurance policy with Royal Globe Insurance Co., appellant, and Novoseller’s own policy with General Accident Group, appellee, provided the statutorily required $15,000 minimum uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlumlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Adelman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Blocker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Kovach v. Gen. Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Estate of Rosato v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Arthur J. Lacourse, on Behalf of the Estate of Peter Lacourse, Deceased v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API