Parkdale International Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EATON, Judge:
Before the court are the motion of plaintiff Parkdale International Ltd. (“Parkdale” or “plaintiff”) for a preliminary injunction pursuant to USCIT Rule 65(a) and the response to Parkdale’s motion of defendant the United States (“defendant”). See Pl.’s Mot. Prelim. Inj. (“Pl.’s Mot.”); Pl.’s Br. Supp. Mot. Prelim. Inj. (“Pl.’s Mem.”); Def.’s Resp. Pl.’s Mot. Inj. (“Def.’s Resp.”); Def.’s Suppl. Resp. Pl.’s Mot. Prelim. Inj. (“Def.’s Suppl. Resp.”). By its motion, Parkdale seeks to enjoin liquidation of its entries of certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.