Baxter v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
The jury should not be left to decide between conflicting propositions contained in the court’s charge, and where in instructing the jury the judge gives them an incorrect instruction it is not sufficient that he thereafter, without expressly withdrawing the incorrect charge, merely charges them correctly on the same proposition. Savannah Elec. Co. v. McClelland, 128 Ga. 87 (2) (57 SE 91); Citizens &c. Nat. Bank v. Kontz, 185 Ga. 131, 146 (194 SE 536). A charge which thus contains two distinct statements, conflicting one with the other, is calculated to leave the jury in such a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. KontzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Savannah Electric Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Plaspohl v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Rice v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dent v. Memorial Hospital of AdelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Flexible Products Co. v. ErvastCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Mote v. MoteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Dent v. Memorial Hospital of AdelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998