Legal Opinion

Plaspohl v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1953No. 34421PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. “A palpable slip of the tongue on the part, of the judge in instructing the jury as to an abstract proposition of law is not sufficient cause for reversing the judgment, where upon consideration of it in connection with the context and all the rest of the charge, it is plain that the jury could not have been misled.” Brooks v. Carver, 55 Ga. App. 362, 363 (190 S. E. 389). Applying this rule to the first special assignment of error, it is obvious that the judge’s inadvertence in using the word “employee” where he meant “employer” was a palpable mistake which could not have caused the jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Savannah Electric Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. WessingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Nixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Srochi v. KamenskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. State Highway Department v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Mote v. MoteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API