Legal Opinion
United States v. Rudolph v.tate, A/K/A Rudy v.tate
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 3, 1972No. 71-1019PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are asked to decide whether the district court erred in dismissing the indictment against Rudolph V. Tate, and whether the juvenile court complied with the mandate of a full investigation in the juvenile waiver proceedings in accordance with the teaching in Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966). We find that error was committed and that the indictment should not have been dismissed. We also find that in its waiver proceeding, the juvenile court judge did in fact comply with the procedures established in Kent.
On June 10,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Larry O. Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dozier v. Haziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. T.J.H. v. BillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- James Arthur Brown v. J. D. Cox, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. 35834-1Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- State v. BillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- James Arthur Brown v. J. D. Cox, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.