Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. 35834-1
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 15, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1406PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
This appeal questions the correctness of a juvenile court order refusing to suspend criminal prosecution of a minor and ordering him transferred for prosecution as an adult. Appellant claims that there were no reasonable grounds to believe (1) he was not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation and (2) that he was not commitable to an institution for mentally deficient or mentally ill persons.
Pursuant to Rule 14, Rules of Juvenile Court, 17 A.R.S., the court made the requisite finding of probable cause (not challenged on appeal) and also found that the minor was not amenable to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mikulovsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. Freddie A. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Walter HowardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Grannum v. BerardWashington Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-93117Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. 53358-6Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-96215Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In re the Appeal in Coconino County Juvenile Action No. J-10359Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- In re the Appeal in Pinal County, Juvenile Action No. J-677Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.