Legal Opinion

Welsh, Driscoll & Buck v. Buck

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1925No. 4127PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff (respondent herein) brought this action against the defendant (appellant herein) to recover upon two causes of action: (1) Upon an account stated for $6,958.61 alleged to have been due in September, 1918; (2) for goods, wares and merchandise amounting to $886.97 on September 1, 1918, for which demands judgment was prayed.

Defendant’s answer whereupon issues were joined denied that there was anything due from defendant to the plaintiff; also claimed that a proper claim was never presented to the said executor in that it was not duly verified; or that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  2. Howard v. J. P. Paulson Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Welsh, Driscoll & Buck v. BuckUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate Counseling Service, Inc., a Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Clayton v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Federal Security Insurance Company v. Joseph L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  4. In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Howard's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API