Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
Tbis appeal is based solely upon tbe findings made by tbe district court — appellant being dissatisfied witb tbe conclusions.
In brief, tbe court found that tbe plaintiff, on IVlarcb 25, 1935, while in tbe employ of tbe International Harvester Company in tbis state, suffered sucb an injury in tbe course of bis employment as entitled bim to recover compensation from tbe Workmen’s Compensa tion Bureau; that lie filed bis claim for compensation with tbe bureau on January S}8, 1936; and that be “has a meritorious claim for compensation insurance to tbe extent of 50% of weekly compensation for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Gotchy v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Pace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Simmons v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tice v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Novak v. NovakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Schmidt v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.