Legal Opinion

Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1937No. File No. 6507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the grounds:

“First: That the judgment sought to be appealed from is a judgment in the defendant’s favor; that the defendant is not aggrieved by said judgment; that consequently the defendant can not appeal therefrom.
“Second: That a litigant can not appeal from Findings of Fact.
“Third: That the judgment sought to be appealed from has been on appeal by the plaintiff reversed by the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota; that the remittitur has gone down to the District Court, that pursuant to such remittitur and mandate of the Supreme…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wittmayer v. Security State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. ReeveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hjelle v. BakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bernhardt v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Alm Construction Company v. VertinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API