Legal Opinion
Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1937No. File No. 6507PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the grounds:
“First: That the judgment sought to be appealed from is a judgment in the defendant’s favor; that the defendant is not aggrieved by said judgment; that consequently the defendant can not appeal therefrom.
“Second: That a litigant can not appeal from Findings of Fact.
“Third: That the judgment sought to be appealed from has been on appeal by the plaintiff reversed by the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota; that the remittitur has gone down to the District Court, that pursuant to such remittitur and mandate of the Supreme…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Wittmayer v. Security State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. ReeveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hjelle v. BakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Bernhardt v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Alm Construction Company v. VertinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- King v. Stark CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Pearce v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.