Legal Opinion
State v. Danberg
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 1, 1939No. Nos. 15 & 16PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Richards, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The first reason relied upon by the defendant to quash the indictments against him, involves a construction of Section 16 of Article 2 of the Constitution of Delaware, which contains this language:
“No bill or joint resolution, except bills appropriating money for public purposes, shall embrace more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title.”
This article of our constitution has been considered by the Court on numerous occasions and it has consistently defined its purpose in these terms:
“It may be assumed as settled that the purpose…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HobsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- United States v. 1,010.8 ACRES, ETC.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Ajax Distributors, Inc. v. SpringerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.