Legal Opinion
Stottlemyer v. Crampton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 1, 1964No. [No. 322, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.
The appellants, Austin S. Stottlemyer and Fannie M. Stottlemyer, his wife, appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Washington County which enjoined them from driving their cattle upon the public road leading through an unincorporated village known as Antietam Furnace. The bill of complaint filed by the appellees, who were residents of Antietam Furnace and landowners therein, alleged that the driving of cattle through the village constituted a nuisance due to (1) impediment of traffic, (2) the dropping of manure, and (3) damage to their properties. The appellants answered, denying the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Gorman v. SaboCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Meadowbrook Swimming Club, Inc. v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Bombard v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Bishop Processing Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Izzo v. MeyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Echard v. KraftCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Nebel v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.