Legal Opinion

Nebel v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1956No. Appeal, 148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

This appeal resulted from the refusal of the court below, sitting en banc, to take off a compulsory nonsuit which was entered on the ground there was no proof that the defendant municipality was negligent. The suit was originally brought against the City of Pittsburgh, and the original defendant joined Marie Leahy as an additional defendant.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as we are required to do (O’Connor v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company, 362 Pa. 404, 66 A. 2d 818), the facts are: On the afternoon of January 29,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blue Anchor Overall Co. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Whitton v. H. A. Gable Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Goodman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Pronzato v. GuerrinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Walker v. County of CoconinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Noonday Club of Delaware County, Inc. Liquor License CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API