Legal Opinion

Bishop Processing Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 1957No. [No. 223, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiffs (appellees) to perpetually enjoin the defendant (appellant) from maintaining and operating its processing plant near Bishop, Maryland, on the basis that the same constitutes a nuisance, and that the odors emanating therefrom interfere with the rightful use and enjoyment by the plaintiffs of their properties in the area.

Many witnesses were offered by the appellant and the appellees, and much testimony was taken. It will be unnecessary to attempt to set forth all of this evidence in detail, but it amply supports a finding of the following facts:

The appellant, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShiebeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Woodyear v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  3. Dittman v. ReppCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Gorman v. SaboCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Scott v. BayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Becker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Tyler v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Mayor of Bladensburg, Inc. v. Berg, Trading as Berg Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Fantasy Valley Resort, Inc. v. Gaylord Fuel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API