Bell v. . Danzer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The facts pertinent to the points involved in the appeal are as herein set out:
The action was brought by Chas. W. Bell against William A. Danzer, Cleveland A. Trantum, Robert M. Rupp, and Troy I. Herring for the recovery of $17,500, with interest thereon from 16 March, 1918, representing the par value of $17,500 of a $25,000 issue to Chas. W. Bell of the capital stock of the White Lake Lumber Company (a proposed corporation), which the defendants had contracted and agreed to purchase from the said Chas. W. Bell under the provisions of a certain contract and agreement entered into between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Oglesby v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Jones v. . StanlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Bond v. Pickett Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Winston v. Williams & McKeithan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Baker v. Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Eller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- In Re Sale of Land of SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- May v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.