Farnsworth v. White County
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s affirmance of the administrative law judge’s ruling that appellant was not entitled to recover workers’ compensation benefits. Farnsworth v. White County, 39 Ark. App. 98, 839 S.W.2d 229 (1992). We agree with the finding of the Court of Appeals that appellant, as a duly elected constable for Cypert Township, White County, Arkansas, is a county official and thus is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Since we find it hard to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Fort Smith v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- American Casualty Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- First State Bank of Miami v. FATHHEREE, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
- Farnsworth v. White County & Township of CypertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Phillips v. City of Eureka SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gritts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Mings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.