Legal Opinion
Canal Insurance v. Ranger Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 21, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND STIPULATION OF FACTS
HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.
Canal Insurance Company (Canal) is seeking to recover a pro-rata contribution from Ranger Insurance Company (Ranger) and Pan American Fire & Casualty Company (Pan American) for settlements made by Canal following an automobile accident in Florida. The parties have agreed to stipulate to the facts and submit the case on briefs to this court for decision. All pertinent papers have been filed, the matter is ready for decision, accordingly this court adopts the stipulation of facts and makes the following conclusions of law.
Stipulations of Fact
1.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Lucas v. GarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Barkley v. International Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO. INC. v. Liberty M. Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Travelers Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Cross-Appellant v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Floyd v. Ohio General InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
- North River Insurance v. United National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991