Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 15, 1967No. 18669PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

The circuit judge sustained the respondents’ demurrer to the complaint of the appellant, and dismissed the action. The ground of the demurrer is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that one tort-feasor is seeking contribution from another tortfeasor on a judgment rendered against both. This court is now asked to review and reverse the order of the lower court.

The relevant allegations of the complaint, which must be accepted as true for the purpose of the demurrer, are in essence as follows:

That Robert M. Gray procured a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Gray Ex Rel. Gray v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Alderman v. BivinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. Hills v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  5. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. of Richmond v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Auto Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Interstate Agency, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
  2. Long v. SeabrookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Whitten v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. Coastal Distributing Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. Tatham v. HokeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API