Legal Opinion

People v. Tanner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2003No. Docket 123414PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns when, under MCL 775.15, a defendant is entitled to have expert assistance appointed at public expense in a criminal proceeding. Defendant sought expert assistance regarding deoxyribonucleic acid (dna) and serology evidence, even though the DNA evidence excluded defendant and the serology evidence suggested only that defendant was one of 2.9 million people who could have been the source of the blood found at the crime scene. Further, defendant failed to give any specific reason why this expert assistance was necessary. The trial court refused defendant’s request, rul*439ing that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. CressMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. JollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. JacobsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. TannerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hattie Tanner v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Hattie Tanner v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. People v. BergmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People of Michigan v. Johnny Ray KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. People v. CarnicomMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API