Legal Opinion

People v. Riley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2003No. Docket 121751PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

2Per curiam

The prosecutor sought leave to appeal the Court of Appeals decision reversing defendant’s first-degree murder conviction on the basis that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a directed verdict of acquittal. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the defendant’s conviction of felony murder. Because the prosecution presented sufficient evidence in its case-in-chief to support a finding that defendant was guilty of felony murder as an aider and abettor, defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek a directed verdict.

I. FACTS AND…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. GintherMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. LeBlancMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by150 opinions

  1. People v. Hardy; People v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. SchraubenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2017

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API