Legal Opinion

People of State of California v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1996No. Nos. 94-70197, 95-70470, 95-70519 and 95-70571PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

California’s Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) has filed two petitions seeking review of the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) decision denying reconsideration of the FCC’s rule that subscribers who fail to choose the method to prevent disclosure of their nonpublished1 telephone numbers, when Caller ID service becomes effective, must be served with a system that requires the customer to dial *67 each time a call is made (“per call blocking”) to protect his or her privacy. CPUC argues that this rule violates federal constitutional rights, and arbitrarily and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. Iowa Utilities Board v. F.C.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Mintz v. Mark Bartelstein & Associates, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  5. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Intervenor on Behalf of Arizona Corporation Commission State of New Jersey, Board of Public Utilities State of Nebraska State of California State of Connecticut Amici on Behalf of v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Vonage Holdings Corporation Time Warner, Inc. Time Warner Cable, Inc. America Online, Inc. Level 3 Communications, LLC Charter Communications, Inc. High Tech Broadband Coalition 8 X 8, Inc. Bellsouth Corporation Qwest Communications International, Inc. Verizon the Voice on Net Coalition, Inc. pulver.com Pacific Lightnet, Inc. At & T, Inc., Formerly Known as Sbc Communications Inc. And at & T Corp Intervenors on Behalf of California Public Utilities Commission Amicus on Behalf of National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Intervenor on Behalf of Arizona Corporation Commission State of New Jersey, Board of Public Utilities State of Nebraska State of California State of Connecticut Amici on Behalf of v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Vonage Holdings Corporation Time Warner, Inc. Time Warner Cable, Inc. America Online, Inc. Level 3 Communications, LLC Charter Communications, Inc. High Tech Broadband Coalition 8 X 8, Inc. Bellsouth Corporation Qwest Communications International, Inc. Verizon the Voice on Net Coalition, Inc. pulver.com Pacific Lightnet, Inc. At & T, Inc., Formerly Known as Sbc Communications Inc. And at & T Corp Intervenors on Behalf of California Public Utilities Commission Amicus on Behalf of Public Utilities Commission of Ohio National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Intervenor on Behalf of Arizona Corporation Commission State of New Jersey, Board of Public Utilities State of Nebraska State of California State of Connecticut Amici on Behalf of v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Vonage Holdings Corporation Time Warner, Inc. Time Warner Cable, Inc. America Online, Inc. Level 3 Communications, LLC Charter Communications, Inc. High Tech Broadband Coalition 8 X 8, Inc. Bellsouth Corporation Qwest Communications International, Inc. Verizon pulver.com the Voice on Net Coalition, Inc. Pacific Lightnet, Inc. At & T, Inc., Formerly Known as Sbc Communications Inc. And at & T Corp Intervenors on Behalf of California Public Utilities Commission Amicus on Behalf of People of the State of New York the Public Service Commission of the State of New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Intervenor on Behalf of Arizona Corporation Commission State of New Jersey, Board of Public Utilities State of Nebraska State of California State of Connecticut Amici on Behalf of v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Vonage Holdings Corporation Time Warner, Inc. Time Warner Cable, Inc. America Online, Inc. Level 3 Communications, LLC Charter Communications, Inc. High Tech Broadband Coalition 8 X 8, Inc. Bellsouth Corporation Qwest Communications International, Inc. Verizon pulver.com the Voice on Net Coalition, Inc. Pacific Lightnet, Inc. At & T, Inc., Formerly Known as Sbc Communications Inc. And at & T Corp Intervenors on Behalf of California Public Utilities Commission Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API