Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
This is a consolidated challenge to the most recent attempt of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to implement provisions of the landmark 1996 Telecommunications Act (the “Act”). 1 Petitioners, joined by numerous intervenors, challenge several aspects of the FCC’s Universal Service Order (the “Order”) implementing the provisions of the Act codified at 47 U.S.C. § 254. We grant the petition for review in part, deny it in part, affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.
I. BaCKGround.
A. The 1996 Act and the Universal Servioe Order.
Beginning with…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Rural Cellular Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- State v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Sierra Club v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.