Legal Opinion

Opalach v. Cebulah

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 1, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the tenant from a judgment for possession rendered by the Hoboken District Court in a proceeding underR.S. 2:32-265 et seq. The first question presented is what matters can be considered on the appeal. Prior to September 15, 1948, it was entirely clear, from the express terms of the statute, that such a judgment for possession was not appealable and could not be reviewed on certiorari save on the ground that the District Court lacked jurisdiction in the particular case.R.S. 2:32-273. Fowler v. Rowe, 25 N.J.L. 549 (Sup. Ct. 1856); Montalvo v. Levinston, 94 N.J.L. 87…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Modern Industrial Bank v. TaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  2. Van Vlaanderen Machine Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  3. Fowler v. RoeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
  4. Kowitski v. FellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
  5. Montalvo v. LevinstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vineland Shopping Center, Inc. v. De MarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Hertzberg v. SiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. L. Albert & Son, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Terrill Manor, Inc. v. KuckelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Construction & Renting Corp. v. SteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API