Legal Opinion

Van Vlaanderen Machine Co. v. Fox

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On certiorari to the Paterson District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

There are two insuperable objections in the way of the prosecutor: 1. The proceeding is a summary proceeding by a landlord to dispossess a tenant. The District Court act, like the Landlord and Tenant act, forbids an appeal or removal by certiorari. Comp. Stat., p. 1990, § 113; Comp. Stat., p. 3074, pi. 18g. The prohibition is absolute and forbids appeal or removal as well by landlord as by tenant- The tenant is protected by his right to bring an, action of trespass and to recover his damages. The landlord needs no review since there is no…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Academy Spires, Inc. v. JonesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Opalach v. CebulahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Schlesinger v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Terrill Manor, Inc. v. KuckelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Wallworth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API